7 7
6HOME5ABOUT US43CONTACT US7 DAY TRIAL2ORDER CATALOGUE1E-LEARNING
News RSS Blog RSS

2SHOP ONLINE
 

13 Assessment Forms
13 Bespoke Production
13 Booklets
13 Clearance
13 DVD
13 E-Learning
13 Ergonomic Equipment
12 Fire Safety DVDs
11 First Aid Items
10 Interactive CD Roms
9 Manual Handling DVDs
8 Multi-Lingual DVDs
7 New Products
6 Posters & Safety Signs
5 Safety Equipment
4 Safety Monkey
3 SME E-Learning
2 Special Offers
1 Stand Alone Training CD Rom
5 Swine Flu Guidance
4 ToolBox Talks DVDs
3 Trainer Guides
2 Value Packs
1 Video on Demand

 
2

FEATURED PRODUCT
 



Manual Handling
NEW Edition
 

NEWS CATEGORIES
 
 ALL NEWS
 Asbestos
 Construction
 Corporate manslaughter
 COSHH
 Court Cases
 DSE
 Fire Safety
 Legislation
 Manual Handling
 Risk Assessment
 Slips, Trips and Falls
 Statistics
 Stress
 Working at Height
 

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Unsafe scaffolding leads to prosecution and fine

December 1, 2009

Unsafe scaffolding leads to prosecution and fine
An eagle-eyed safety inspector was lied to after he stopped to investigate unsafe scaffolding he was driving past, a court heard.

Health and Safety Executive (HSE) inspector Steve Woods was driving past the Coach & Horses Inn in Billinghay, Lincolnshire, on 11 June 2008 when he saw three employees of Bracknell Roofing Co Ltd using an unsafe tower scaffold to repair a flat roof.

The roof and tower scaffold had no edge protection, inadequate boarding which was not properly attached and it was propped up on bricks and blocks. A manager had visited the site and allowed work to continue only 45 minutes before Mr Woods arrived and found dangerous safety defects.

Bracknell Roofing Co Ltd, of Suffolk Way, Sevenoaks, Kent, was fined £8,000 and ordered to pay full costs of £2572.80 by Skegness Magistrates on 25th November 2009 after pleading guilty to breaching Regulations 4(1) and 8b(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005.

Steve Woods said: This inadequate tower scaffold was owned by Bracknell Roofing and had been taken out of their depot just for this job. The three men on site refused to give me the name of the company and also gave false names and contact details.

Falls from height remain the most common kind of workplace fatality. The men were at risk of serious injury either from falling off the roof or the tower scaffold. The case shows the need for companies to ensure that work at height is properly planned and supervised and that equipment provided is suitable and maintained in good condition.

In this case the equipment that should have been used was easily available and could have been provided by the company if adequate planning of the work had been undertaken. The unsafe working practice should have been stopped by the company manager when he visited site.

Find out more about Working at Heights



More Court Cases news:

Worker left paralysed after being crushed by 600 pound steel beam - August 31, 2010
Falling panel saw leaves employee brain damaged - August 26, 2010
GBP15,000 fine after worker left with hole through his shin - August 25, 2010
Lack of risk assessment leads to car falling from pier - August 25, 2010
GBP8,000 fine for steeplejack firm - August 17, 2010

CONTACT US SEARCH PERSONALISE FAQ PRIVACY POLICY TERMS & CONDITIONS DISCLAIMER